getkirby / kirby

Kirby's core application folder
https://getkirby.com
Other
1.32k stars 170 forks source link

Error message after browser inactivity "Failed to fetch" #6077

Open gbdesign2023 opened 11 months ago

gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago

Already with 'Kirby 3', the message "Failed to fetch" was displayed in the panel when the browser was inactive, e.g. after hibernation. This also continues with 'Kirby 4'. The problem is not reproducible, as the error message is displayed sporadically.

failed

failed failed-to-fetch

The following JS is displayed in the log: /media/panel/23fb94884a48c87b2205cae4ed48d2a6/js/index.min.js

lukasbestle commented 11 months ago

Do you have the opportunity to run the dev build of the Panel so we know where in the code the error is thrown?

You can run the dev build like so:

  1. Replace your kirby folder with a clone of this repo so that you have all files, including the source files.
  2. Follow the instructions in https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/tree/main/panel#kirby-panel
  3. After running npm run dev, your browser should open the Panel in dev mode.

If you aren't able to do this, please let us know.

gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago

Thank you @lukasbestle for your feedback, unfortunately I have no way of following your instructions. I use MAMP locally. However, the error message has also occurred on a live site. It only appears if, for example, the computer was in sleep mode, the screen saver was active or the browser tab was open in the background. Can I collect further useful information with the Developer Tools console?

lukasbestle commented 11 months ago

With the production build it's unfortunately very hard to find the source of the issue, i.e. the specific request that fails and the code that should handle the case of a suspended network connection. The methods and lines in the trace point to the minified sources.

I haven't encountered this before and as you write it is hard to reproduce specifically. However it seems like you had this issue a few times already.

Another thing you could try:

  1. I've built a source map for Kirby 4.0.1. Download it from here, extract the ZIP and upload the .map file to the kirby/panel/dist folder of your site: index.min.js.map.zip
  2. Edit the kirby/panel/dist/index.min.js file and put the following comment in a new line at the end of the file: //# sourceMappingURL=index.min.js.map
  3. Delete the media/panel folder and clear your browser cache
  4. If you run into the same issue again, your trace will include more information that will help us with finding the source of the issue
gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago

Unfortunately, I don't have the expertise to follow your instructions from the first message. So thank you for your temporary solution. I hope the error message will reappear shortly and I can give you more details.

However it seems like you had this issue a few times already.

Yes, I have seen this error message many times before. Sometimes after a short time, when another tab was open in the browser and I returned to the Kirby panel. Sometimes only after the computer has been idle.

I've built a source map for Kirby 4.0.1.

In the meantime I have updated to 4.0.2. Is the index.min.js.map still compatible with it?

I now keep the Kirby panel open in the Polypane browser. The DevTools are always open there and the chances of getting more detailed information are better here.

lukasbestle commented 11 months ago

Yes, there were no changes in the frontend code between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2. Thanks for testing :)

gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago

@lukasbestle I had the PC in sleep mode overnight and after waking up the error message "Failed to fetch" was immediately visible again. I have now been able to copy the relevant passages in Chrome DevTools. I hope this information helps you. I was unable to achieve success with Polypane, as the page is automatically reloaded.

Bildschirmfoto 2023-12-23 um 07 35 52

plugins.js:39 Plugin is replacing "k-block-type-table" hu @ plugins.js:39 https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/panel/plugins.js

37  // check if the component is replacing a core component
38  if (isComponent(name) === true) {
39      window.console.warn(`Plugin is replacing "${name}"`);
40  }

at request.js:39:55 https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/api/request.js

38  // fetch the resquest's response
39  const { response } = await responder(request, await fetch(request));
40
41  let data = response.json;

at Qa.e.request (index.js:56:17) https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/api/index.js

55  try {
56      return await Request(api)(path, options);
57  } finally {
58      // restart the ping
59      ping();

at Object. (get.js:12:14) https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/api/get.js

12  return api.request(
13      path,
14      Object.assign(options ?? {}, {
15          method: "GET"
16      }),

at a.check (FormButtons.vue:186:1) https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/components/Forms/FormButtons.vue

183 methods: {
184 async check() {
185     if (this.$panel.isOffline === false) {
186         const { lock } = await this.$api.get(...this.api);
187         set(this.$panel.view.props, "lock", lock);
188     }
189 },

error @ panel.js https://gbd:8890/kirby-test/media/panel/src/panel/panel.js

167 error(error, openNotification = true) {
168     if (this.debug === true) {
169         console.error(error);
170     }
171
172     if (openNotification === true) {
173         return this.notification.error(error);
174     }
175 },
gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago
  1. If you run into the same issue again, your trace will include more information that will help us with finding the source of the issue

How/where can I read out the additional information?

lukasbestle commented 11 months ago

Thank you @gbdesign2023. That already confirms the source of the issue. đź‘Ť I'll still keep the "needs replication" label as I haven't been able to reproduce this on my machine yet.

The issue is very similar to https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/issues/5821 except that you get "Failed to fetch" instead of "NetworkError when attempting to fetch resource". But the difference in wording can also be because of a different browser as the error message is generated by the browser's fetch() implementation. To fix the issue, we have added a check that prevents the request from being sent when the Panel is offline. But for some reason, this does not seem to take effect for you.

@distantnative Do you have an idea why the lock request is sent and fails anyway?

gbdesign2023 commented 11 months ago

Yes, the other error looks very similar. Unfortunately, the error message appears sporadically and cannot be reproduced. In any case, I have not yet found a way to do this. Could a browser add-on be the trigger? Or would that be visible in the DevTools log? I will try to open the Kirby panel in incognito mode with inactive add-ons and leave the PC in sleep mode overnight.

distantnative commented 11 months ago

@lukasbestle Maybe the offline event from the browser isn't as immediate as one would hope? So the Panel still thinks it's online and sends a lock request but that already fails?

lukasbestle commented 11 months ago

That could be it. Unfortunately the errors don't seem to be fully standardized. The spec just says "reject with a TypeError", so we cannot detect network errors specifically. If we could, we could have a mode in our request code that ignores and silently drops network errors and only throws other kinds of errors.

miragecraft commented 10 months ago

I've been encountering this error when my computer wake up from sleep and I have the panel open in the browser tab.

beebmx commented 8 months ago

I have the same error

github-actions[bot] commented 6 months ago

This issue has been marked as stale because it requires further input but has not seen activity in the past months. This is for us to prioritize issues that are still relevant and actionable. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within the next 15 days. If this issue is still relevant to you, please help us in gathering the necessary input.

lukasbestle commented 6 months ago

I think we know now why this happens and even if we ourselves couldn't reproduce it yet, it's clear that it can happen at any time. The issue is more that it's difficult to find a solution as discussed above.

miragecraft commented 6 months ago

It wasn’t a problem in v3, is it possible to revert to the old way of handling the error?

The biggest issue with this is that the error forces the page to reload, and will wipe out all the changes you’ve made in the editor. It’s especially problematic on mobile devices. I am forced to write my content in another editor and then copy it over to the panel when I’m done to ensure I won’t lose my work.

afbora commented 6 months ago

I can reproduce the issue with following steps:

Localhost method

Live site method

When the computer goes to sleep, it turns off the internet connection. So I think this is expected behavior.

afbora commented 6 months ago

I'm almost pretty sure that this issue won't happen if content.locking option is disabled.

distantnative commented 6 months ago

@afbora Could you please check if these events are triggered: https://github.com/getkirby/kirby/blob/main/panel/src/panel/events.js#L16-L21? Cause if they'd be triggered properly, no content locking requests should be made while the Panel is offline.

afbora commented 6 months ago

@distantnative I've put console.log in online and offline emitter. Nothing happened. Logs is clear. Seems online and offline emitter never run. Am I missing something to test?

distantnative commented 6 months ago

I think there are two connected problems:

nilshoerrmann commented 6 months ago

Maybe this is helpful:

I recently had to restart my router and got a "Panel is offline" message which was fine. While the router was rebooting it first reestablished wireless connection and only after that reconnected to our provider. But the panel message disappeared as soon as the wireless connection to the router was verified.

So the online event doesn't seem to check if there is actually a connection to a server but only to the next device allowing for internet communication. Not what you actually want to know in this case …

miragecraft commented 1 month ago

Has there been any updates on this issue?

This is currently the biggest pain point of Kirby for me.

bastianallgeier commented 1 month ago

@miragecraft we have already changed the behavior of the offline check to not run in local environments. This is in 4.4 Locking will also be gone entirely in v5, which should solve this once and for all.