Closed dcbriccetti closed 4 years ago
Merging #816 into master will increase coverage by
0.04%
. The diff coverage is0%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #816 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 48.63% 48.68% +0.04%
- Complexity 1643 1644 +1
============================================
Files 192 192
Lines 10319 10313 -6
Branches 743 743
============================================
+ Hits 5019 5021 +2
+ Misses 4942 4934 -8
Partials 358 358
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...i/reused/transfer/sourcetarget/target/Central.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
...reused/transfer/sourcetarget/source/Aggregate.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
...i/reused/transfer/sourcetarget/source/Central.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
...reused/transfer/sourcetarget/target/Aggregate.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
.../opendatakit/briefcase/ui/MainBriefcaseWindow.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
src/org/opendatakit/briefcase/ui/reused/UI.java | 40.27% <0%> (ø) |
9 <0> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
...g/opendatakit/briefcase/ui/export/ExportPanel.java | 50% <0%> (+1.92%) |
15% <0%> (+1%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f7cc413...f3535d3. Read the comment docs.
Perhaps @ggalmazor can fix the unchecked call to put in makeClickable.
I don't see a way to remove that unchecked call. I think we need to @Supress("unchecked")
to the overloaded method.
Why not assuming that boolean underline
will always be true and simplify the if
block? We can extract a method to get the underlined font and isolate the unchecked operation there.
@ggalmazor Thanks for that. What do you think about removing underlines from links throughout Briefcase?
What do you think about removing underlines from links throughout Briefcase?
I don't have a strong opinion about it. I'll let @yanokwa and @kkrawczyk123 fight for it ;)
I don't have a strong opinion about that too and I am not protesting :)
Remove the underline, keep the blue.
Yo, yo, yo, this is ready to go. (I’m in no rush, but the Github prodder has appeared.)
Closes #815
Please see the commit comments for details of the changes.
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Not enough. It looks great on a Mac, but I’ll need help checking on other platforms. Could someone please check that the underline is gone and that the hyperlink still works when Aggregate or Central is the source or target?
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
Using a ContentPane and BorderLayout seems best.
How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?
Should have no effect.
Does this change require updates to documentation? If so, please file an issue at https://github.com/opendatakit/docs/issues/new and include the link below.
No