Open lognaturel opened 1 month ago
The integrityUrl value is a URL that accepts a query parameter named uuid representing the UUID of an Entity that the client wants to know about. A comma-separated list of UUIDs is also accepted.
I always trend towards feeling that UUIDs should just be referred to as ids
rather than explicitly passing them around as uuid
. Is there a good argument for that not being the case?
Is there a good argument for that not being the case?
For better or worse, we already have several APIs that use the name uuid
for the unique ID of an Entity. This one isn't user-facing so I don't feel strongly about it but I do generally think consistency is helpful. If we could go back in time I would probably have preferred we use __id
consistently everywhere.
As the implementer of a data collection client, if there are Entities in the client's representation that are not included in the server response I want to be able to request the status of those specific Entities So that I can delete any Entities that no longer exist on the server
As the implementer of a data collection client I want to be able to get information about specific Entities So that I can make sure their state is up to date in my local representation
Strawman proposal
integrityUrl
element that may only appear in amediaFile
block withtype
attribute (see https://github.com/getodk/central/issues/665) set toentityList
.integrityUrl
value is a URL that accepts a query parameter nameduuid
representing the UUID of an Entity that the client wants to know about. A comma-separated list of UUIDs is also accepted.Interesting cases to design for
Deleted and purged Entities
Currently purged Submissions are completely removed so it's possible to reuse an id. Entity purge is not yet implemented. We'll need to decide whether to keep historic UUIDs or allow reuse. Allowing reuse would only be an issue in very rare cases.
Let's not allow reuse of UUIDs when Entities are soft-deleted to avoid the case where Entities with the same UUID are in trash and active.
Rejected submissions that never resulted in Entity creation
Two concepts have emerged so far: send the
instanceID
to the integrity API to detect this case or keep a notion of "phantom" entities that wanted to be created but never were.Todo
deleted
element so the name matches what it represents (true: server knows of the Entity and it shouldn't be on that client; false: server either doesn't know of the Entity or it knows it and it should stay on the client)CC @seadowg