Closed damian-gn closed 1 year ago
I have proposed PR #659 to allow older versions of urllib3
. Not sure if it will be accepted or not.
Same. This library is used by Moto which I think is the standard test library for AWS services. That library relies on boto. Boto has a hard constraint for urlib < 1.27
Hello team,
I see that in yesterday's release, you have changed
responses
to require v2.0 of urllib3 or higher.This is causing us some dependency conflicts, as our projects use other packages that are still running on the v1.0 branch.
I see that urllib3 v1.0 is still being actively maintaned. Is there a specific reason that
responses
can no longer use it? I had a look at the discussions in #635 and #636, which discuss compatibility issues with v3.0, but I don't understand why the minimum version was changed here.Since
responses
is of course a testing library that we don't install in production, I would opine that it should keep version constraints as loose as possible, so that it accurately tests the version(s) of other packages that would be installed in a production environment. 🙂 Is it possible to get this changed?