Open quickstark opened 1 year ago
Assigning to @getsentry/support for routing ⏲️
Routing to @getsentry/product-owners-issues for triage ⏲️
@quickstark - Interesting. Looks like the parameterization is causing the problem.
This isn't a solution-solution, but can you please run your test again, substituting a *
for the 111
in your fingerprint rule? In the meantime, I'll solicit opinions on potentially carving out a parameterization exception for Errorno xxx
.
@quickstark - Interesting. Looks like the parameterization is causing the problem.
This isn't a solution-solution, but can you please run your test again, substituting a
*
for the111
in your fingerprint rule? In the meantime, I'll solicit opinions on potentially carving out a parameterization exception forErrorno xxx
.
Actually, I'm not sure this is the problem. I'd still love to know the results of the above test, but can you also please try using error.value:"*Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused*" -> connection-error
rather than message:...
?
Environment
SaaS (https://sentry.io/)
Steps to Reproduce
Need an Issue with a long message (650+ bytes).
message:"*Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection refused*" -> connection-error
Additional Context: In the Event Grouping Details, the default grouping is a bit different than the message:
Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno <int>] Connection refused'
Expected Result
Should expect all events with the stated string to be grouped.
Actual Result
Individual issues are still being created after the Fingerprint Rule was added.
Product Area
Issues
Link
Being submitted by Dirk N (Sentry EE) on behalf of a customer. Can share Org internally.
DSN
No response
Version
No response
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Improvement by Unito