With the help of @romtsn I figured out that the current behavior (using 0 as the line number if there isn't one) accords with Google's implementation of retrace. Their retrace, however, can also resolve such cases without any line number at all. We should update our remapping logic to achieve the same thing.
With the help of @romtsn I figured out that the current behavior (using 0 as the line number if there isn't one) accords with Google's implementation of
retrace. Theirretrace, however, can also resolve such cases without any line number at all. We should update our remapping logic to achieve the same thing.