Closed androidnisse closed 1 month ago
How often does this actually come up? I would consider having to just do a loop in a package file a good tradeoff to the potential complexity of having the macro do it.
How often does this actually come up? I would consider having to just do a loop in a package file a good tradeoff to the potential complexity of having the macro do it.
I have found this once for now. This can be looked at further when all packages use the macro.
Will add what I find here: https://github.com/getsolus/packages/pull/3234/files https://github.com/getsolus/packages/blob/main/packages/j/juliaup/package.yml https://github.com/getsolus/packages/blob/main/packages/p/pueue/package.yml
How often does this actually come up? I would consider having to just do a loop in a package file a good tradeoff to the potential complexity of having the macro do it.
Seems to be 4, see above comment. :)
Would also save one line in ripgrep-all
^^
https://github.com/getsolus/packages/blob/2a91e453f4b6897b3dbbcb50b90443bac311794e/packages/r/ripgrep-all/package.yml#L25-L26
Would also save one line in
ripgrep-all
^^
Good catch 👍
Please confirm there isn't an existing open bug report
Summary
When using %cargo_install it only accepts one binary. If more is needed a loop or using the macro multiple times is needed. See example in https://github.com/getsolus/packages/pull/3229/files
Steps to reproduce
Expected result
It installs all.
Actual result
It fails and falls backs to the package name.
Environment
Repo
Unstable
Desktop Environment
Budgie
System details
x
Other comments
Posted about this in package room on matrix.