Closed spkaluzny closed 2 years ago
@spkaluzny I've discussed this internally with the team and we're fine with the MIT license. It's simple and permissive and thus does the job. Any objections on your part?
Great, let's go with the MIT license. And the package is already set up for it.
Closed with the package under the MIT license.
We need to decide on the open source license to release the
geysertimes
package under. Currently, I have used the MIT license in the License field of the DESCRIPTION file. I needed to have a valid value in that field so I can run R CMD check on the package.A list of open source licenses used by R packages is available here: https://www.r-project.org/Licenses/