ggabbiani
commented
1 year ago Ciao Stock,
the currently implemented extensions are just the ones I needed for a project of mine, but the design is extendible and I had in mind other plugins for both writer and language plugins. The html writer is a planned feature for the next release, c++ language is another of the things I'd like to implement ... eventually.
Support for plugin written in programming language other than C++
- pros: quicker extension of writers by enlarging the number of frameworks potentially usable.
- cons: new runtime dependencies to be managed in the project configuration and in the target platform
A quick and dirty solution is to just export the analytic document in json format, making it possible to write anything else from there. In this case OrthoDocs would be used only for the analytics. I don't like this approach because it complicates things for the final user but it could be implemented very quickly.
A more complete solution would be to move the extension mechanism from static to dynamic and to write a 'general' configurable extension able to trigger an external program after having produced the export of the analytic documents and conveniently transcoded the input parameters.
Does it make sense for you?
Cheers Giampiero
stockiNail
Currently there is only 1 writer, to markdown.
It could be helpful to have different writers, for instance for HTML or PDF. Furthermore, this feature could also enable a writer for framework (i.e. VuePress, Docusaurus) , based on MD, which are creating a complete doc site to publish somewhere (i.e. GH pages).
It could be better that these "plugins" could be coded also in other programming languages.