NCODV.load failing if quality flags not defined

[ctroupin]

I'm trying to read an ODV netCDF but it fails with this message:

julia> NCODV.load(Float64, inputfile, varlist[1])
ERROR: type Nothing has no field var
Stacktrace:
 [1] getproperty(x::Nothing, f::Symbol)
   @ Base ./Base.jl:42
 [2] (::DIVAnd.NCODV.var"#10#11"{Int64, DataType, String, String, Vector{String}})(ds::NCDataset{Nothing})
   @ DIVAnd.NCODV ~/.julia/packages/DIVAnd/eDBbE/src/NCODV.jl:336
 [3] NCDataset(f::DIVAnd.NCODV.var"#10#11"{Int64, DataType, String, String, Vector{String}}, args::String; kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}})
   @ NCDatasets ~/.julia/packages/NCDatasets/opjna/src/dataset.jl:320
 [4] NCDataset(f::Function, args::String)
   @ NCDatasets ~/.julia/packages/NCDatasets/opjna/src/dataset.jl:318
 [5] #load#9
   @ ~/.julia/packages/DIVAnd/eDBbE/src/NCODV.jl:281 [inlined]
 [6] load(T::Type, fname::String, long_name::String)
   @ DIVAnd.NCODV ~/.julia/packages/DIVAnd/eDBbE/src/NCODV.jl:279
 [7] top-level scope
   @ REPL[13]:1

It seems it is because the variables storing the quality flags were not defined: https://github.com/gher-ulg/DIVAnd.jl/blob/master/src/NCODV.jl#L336

The question: shall we

• [x] allow for netCDF files without quality flags (hence modifying the load and loadprof sections or
• [ ] add a line in the docstring of the function to state that the quality flags must be defined?

[jmbeckers]

I would to everything to make the life of the users simple. So allow for netCDF files without flags, put out a warning and fill in the quality values by default to good and then proceed as usual

[Alexander-Barth]

I think we have a document somewhere describing how the NetCDF from ODV need to be prepared. Can we include this in the documentation of this function ?

Note that this loop (https://github.com/gher-ulg/DIVAnd.jl/blob/master/src/NCODV.jl#L99) is quite performance critical. We need to be sure that for the common case (flags present), the code is not slower. @ctroupin , can you make a small NetCDF files producing this error ?

[ctroupin]

Yes, the preparation of the file is described step-by-step here: https://github.com/gher-ulg/Diva-Workshops/blob/master/tricks/ODV_netCDF_export.md and we indeed ask the user to export the quality flags, so the issue should not happen (it did happen because of some specific tests carried out for Reiner).

I agree with @jmbeckers: making the life of the users simple is certainly the good choice. So we can keep this issue as a possible enhancement for the future (maybe not prioritary).

Here is a small file: https://dox.ulg.ac.be/index.php/s/nGmsH5ydCAjgft5

[Alexander-Barth]

Thanks @ctroupin for the small file. My branch can now read the file with a warning. Can you check the master branch and my branch with a large ODV files (with all the flags) to check if there is a slow down (for what should be the common case)?

[ctroupin]

ok I'll check that, I have large files that wait to be tested!

[ctroupin]

First results: reading a large netCDF ODV file (with all the flags and metadata) takes:

• [master]: 904.8 s (33.50 M allocations: 7.140 GiB, 0.28% gc time, 0.41% compilation time)
• [Alex:] 947.9 s (25.85 M allocations: 4.749 GiB, 0.18% gc time).

[Alexander-Barth]

Thanks for the info. I guess this is the price to pay for making the code more general/complex. (If somebody wants to try a different approach, feel free to test it).