Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
[deleted comment]
Both would made more sense if a JS remote debug client was available (chrome
and probably webkit has such a protocol).
The first one would also need to be integrated into the client-side too (as
lines numbers wouldn't be significant otherwise)
The 2nd requires some JS debugger support, as the symbols are only valid from
within the scope of a given closure. If you only deal with root-level symbols,
you already have it, just use Evaluate & CodeGen that, but being limited to
root-level symbols, it's of limited use, f.i. you can't reliably eval
parameters or procedure variables this way. Having it work for anonymous
methods is another case for which JS debugger support is compulsory.
JS debugger support is possible (Google has it for Java with GWT), but I don't
know any existing client for Delphi... but if you feel up to the task...
Original comment by zar...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 2:59
I developed Google Chrome's remote debug protocol for Delphi. He is ready. There is an easy protocol communicates with Json.
Especially my first wish is very important. For the second one is an example of
me if you would be satisfied.
Original comment by fake_si...@hotmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 6:48
> I developed Google Chrome's remote debug protocol for Delphi.
Anywhere it can be downloaded? :)
Original comment by zar...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 6:55
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
my second wish, design, drag and drop will be solved in such works.
Original comment by fake_si...@hotmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 8:04
I share the debugger when the stable release. :)
Original comment by fake_si...@hotmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 8:10
[deleted comment]
would u do my first order?
Original comment by fake_si...@hotmail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 7:00
By "order" your mean you want to pay for it?
Currently, we're doing a feature freeze for a version release @work, so at the
moment I'm only doing fixes. After that, the above feature will probably happen
at some time, but likely not until I can make good use of it myself (and can
test it).
Original comment by zar...@gmail.com
on 17 Apr 2012 at 6:23
Original comment by zar...@gmail.com
on 18 May 2012 at 9:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
fake_si...@hotmail.com
on 11 Apr 2012 at 2:00