Hi,
I'm confused about the example for "facter::facts" in the README.
Could it be, that since 9668a171e9b9bb2ac783f524b00736877d3a0734 this needs to be "facter::facts_hash"?
If it's the same resource (needing a rename): any objections against adding the option to merge the hash (instead of taking the top-level one)?
Hi, I'm confused about the example for "facter::facts" in the README. Could it be, that since 9668a171e9b9bb2ac783f524b00736877d3a0734 this needs to be "facter::facts_hash"?
If it's the same resource (needing a rename): any objections against adding the option to merge the hash (instead of taking the top-level one)?