Are nfs_package and nfs_service supposed to specify the NFS-client or -server package/service?
For RHEL, the default service of this module is "nfs", which is the NFS-server service for RHEL. (For client behavior, I haven't found one.)
For SLES 11, the default service of this module is "nfs", which is the NFS-client service for SLES. In addition there's "nfsserver".
Also for RHEL package "nfs-utils" description says: "NFS utilities and supporting clients and daemons for the kernel NFS server"
For SLES, there's different packages for: "nfs-client" and "nfs-kernel-server".
Maybe a split between NFS-client and NFS-server functionality would be reasonable?
I started investigation, because I did not want to make NFS-servers out of all machines, which should work as NFS-clients. (See also issue #33 .) It'd be good, to handle this within a single module in my opinion.
This issue is to clarify the direction, not necessarily already about implementation.
Are nfs_package and nfs_service supposed to specify the NFS-client or -server package/service? For RHEL, the default service of this module is "nfs", which is the NFS-server service for RHEL. (For client behavior, I haven't found one.) For SLES 11, the default service of this module is "nfs", which is the NFS-client service for SLES. In addition there's "nfsserver". Also for RHEL package "nfs-utils" description says: "NFS utilities and supporting clients and daemons for the kernel NFS server" For SLES, there's different packages for: "nfs-client" and "nfs-kernel-server".
Maybe a split between NFS-client and NFS-server functionality would be reasonable?
I started investigation, because I did not want to make NFS-servers out of all machines, which should work as NFS-clients. (See also issue #33 .) It'd be good, to handle this within a single module in my opinion. This issue is to clarify the direction, not necessarily already about implementation.