I'm the author of this library which was inspired by most of the same issues which inspired this website - for example the Norway problem. The overriding goal was to make it type-safe, which it is.
It doesn't solve 100% of the issues raised, and I still think that there are certain things it shouldn't ever be used for - e.g. deployment pipelines or anything else resembling a programming language, but it's 90% of the way there (still missing a nice, simple spec - one day I will get around to that).
I saw somebody mention it in one of the other issues and I was wondering if you'd be open to some sort of reference to it in the page or if it would spoil the one overriding message of avoiding YAML at all possible costs :)
ghuntley
commented
1 year ago
I'm the author of this library which was inspired by most of the same issues which inspired this website - for example the Norway problem. The overriding goal was to make it type-safe, which it is.
It doesn't solve 100% of the issues raised, and I still think that there are certain things it shouldn't ever be used for - e.g. deployment pipelines or anything else resembling a programming language, but it's 90% of the way there (still missing a nice, simple spec - one day I will get around to that).
I saw somebody mention it in one of the other issues and I was wondering if you'd be open to some sort of reference to it in the page or if it would spoil the one overriding message of avoiding YAML at all possible costs :)