Open Deftig opened 8 years ago
Yes, I can reproduce the same with firefox 47 on linux.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Deftig notifications@github.com wrote:
When running the demo page with FF (47.0) the slider seems to take a moment to catch up with the mouse. IE11 is much better and chrome is working really well. Anyone else getting the same experience?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ghusse/jQRangeSlider/issues/219, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAgLjbCz9YYAZdeGH7-9rUx2pkFQRj7Qks5qNi1ogaJpZM4I5YlQ .
Wow you're quick! What would you make of this? Is that just FF not handling things well or do you think there's something genuinely wrong that needs to be addressed?
I don't know yet, but I'm interested if you can investigate the issue more in depth.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Deftig notifications@github.com wrote:
Wow you're quick! What would you make of this? Is that just FF not handling things well or do you think there's something genuinely wrong that needs to be addressed?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ghusse/jQRangeSlider/issues/219#issuecomment-227396298, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AAgLjRwuxoqh_wO8k_2JtkWfSWlT8Kv_ks5qN7dGgaJpZM4I5YlQ .
Sure, I'd love to help although it's not my area of expertise. I've profiled it up and it looked like the LabelPositioner was the first thing above the jquery level that was coming up, specifically CacheWidth although looking at the code that didn't look too heavy. I configured up a slider without labels and it was definitely sliding more smoothly. I'll take another look when I get a chance
When running the demo page with FF (47.0) the slider seems to take a moment to catch up with the mouse. IE11 is much better and chrome is working really well. Anyone else getting the same experience?