ghutchis / avogadro

Avogadro is an advanced molecular editor designed for cross-platform use in computational chemistry, molecular modeling, bioinformatics, materials science, and related areas. It offers flexible rendering and a powerful plugin architecture.
http://avogadro.cc/
GNU General Public License v2.0
2 stars 0 forks source link

Duplicated menu items #406

Closed ghutchis closed 8 years ago

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

In Extensions menu all items related to quantum chemistry input files (with exception of GAMESS) are duplicated, and each pair calls one dialog window Also, there are two items Create Surfaces, but they call different dialogs

Reported by: @annulen

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

Duplicated items

Original comment by: @annulen

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

This must be related to the renaming of files that happened with the dalton input file commit.

Original comment by: @cstein

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

Original comment by: @cstein

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

Did you do a clean rebuild, i.e. cleaning the build directory, running cmake again and recompiling? I believe this would correct the issue.

Original comment by: cyanat

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

If this question is for me, I've downloaded 0.9.9 from SF, unpacked into empty directory and built it

Original comment by: nobody

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

But are there old extensions installed? This is the culprit. This bug does not happen on Mac or Windows because of the way they are built.

Original comment by: @ghutchis

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

Yes, they are, I didn't clear my /usr/local/lib/avogadro But rpm and deb packages also don't completely remove previously installed software, only replacing files with the same names. This issue can be solved by implementing feature request https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2882816&group_id=165310&atid=835077

Original comment by: @annulen

ghutchis commented 14 years ago

Yes, I agree with the request. I'm going to close this report as a duplicate, if that's OK with you -- we'll follow up with PR#2882816 as you mentioned.

Original comment by: @ghutchis