Closed albbas closed 16 years ago
Date: 2007-09-21 13:15:12 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <
Davvisámi, public beta 2, 2007-09-19
One example on strange compounding behavior that seems to be rather usual:
4-part compound, not accepted by the speller:
muorralastagieraolmmoš (muorra#lasta#giera#olmmoš)
When compound is divided we get following results:
muorralastagiera - accepted (muorra#lasta#giera)
gieraolmmoš - accepted (giera#olmmoš)
lastagiera - accepted (lasta#giera)
lastagieraolmmoš - NOT accepted (lasta#giera#olmmoš)
Date: 2007-09-21 13:22:34 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <
Another example:
4-part compound, not accepted by the speller:
veahkkegoahtesilbageaidnu (veahkke#goahte#silba#geaidnu)
When compound is divided we get following results:
goahtesilbageaidnu - accepted (goahte#silba#geaidnu)
silbageaidnu - accepted (silba#geaidnu)
goahtesilba - accepted (goahte#silba )
veahkkegoahtesilba - NOT accepted (veahkke#goahte#silba )
Date: 2007-09-21 13:30:43 +0200
From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <
(In reply to comment #1)
veahkkegoahtesilba - NOT accepted (veahkke#goahte#silba )
veahkkegoahte
is also NOT accepted. This case is thus a problem with veahkke- compounds.
Date: 2007-09-21 13:39:10 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <
It is not a a problem with veahkke- compounds, because -goahte is shortened form of -goahti: Veahkkegoahti is recognized.
Date: 2007-09-24 10:17:55 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <
here is a 4-word compound that is recognized:
muorralastagierraolmmoš (muorra#lasta#gierra#olmmoš)
Date: 2007-09-24 11:26:23 +0200
From: Knowledge Concepts/Peter Beinema <
2007-09-24, Peter Beinema: several of the examples can't be reproduced:
*** "muorralastagieraolmmoš" is recognised, as are all of its possible 1, 2, and 3 part sub-words; goes for Windows as well as for Mac.
*** "veahkkegoahtesilbageaidnu" is NOT recognised. "silbageaidnu" is, "goahti" is (but "goahte" not) and "veahkke" is not. So: not good, but different from findings below.
I suspect this is a lexicon issue. Further investigation implies decompilation of the lexicon and investigation of its contents.
Date: 2007-09-24 14:41:44 +0200
From: Thomas Omma <
veahkke (with lowering) is only in compounds. Base-form is veahkki
Date: 2007-09-24 14:43:21 +0200
From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <
Peter, can you add what version of the lexicon your results were achieved with? Ie type 'nuvviD', and select the version string, then copy and paste into this bug report.
Date: 2007-09-25 08:10:17 +0200
From: Knowledge Concepts/Peter Beinema <
2007-09-25 Peter Beinema: repro of "muorralastagieraolmmoš" FAILED: the word and all combinations of its parts are accepted. Repro results on "veahkkegoahtesilbageaidnu" SUCCEEDED: correspond with Thomas' results exactly (see below). Versions used: .dll: 2007-09-18; .lex: public beta 1, 2007-05 AND public beta 2, 2007-09-08 OS: windows XP+SP2 Office: Office 2003 = office 11
Date: 2007-11-23 14:44:48 +0100
From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <
Fixed with BOE change.
Case closed.
This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github
Bugzilla Bug 522
Date: 2007-09-21T13:15:12+02:00 From: Thomas Omma <>
To: Thomas Omma <>
CC: pbeinema, sjur.n.moshagen
Last updated: 2007-11-23T14:44:48+01:00