search

giellalt / bugzilla-dummy

0 stars 0 forks source link

hyphens or not in compounds (Bugzilla Bug 894) #662

Closed albbas closed 11 years ago

albbas commented 14 years ago

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 894

Date: 2010-11-12T14:56:01+01:00 From: Thomas Omma <> To: Tomi Pieski <> CC: maja.l.kappfjell, sjur.n.moshagen, trond.trosterud

Last updated: 2013-01-14T15:01:53+01:00

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3502

Date: 2010-11-12 14:56:01 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

sme: boazu-juoigi accepted boazo-juoigi accpeted bohcco-juoigi NOT accepted

smj: Boatsoj-sujtto NOT accepted

sma: beetneh-vierhtieh NOT accepted learoe-vierhtie-prosjekte accepted

I mean we should be categorial, either we accept all hyphened compounds or we do not

Davvisámi, version 1.2, 2010-11-03 Julevsáme, version 1.2, 2010-11-05 Åarjelsaemien, version 1.0b, 2010-11-03

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3507

Date: 2010-11-15 10:11:00 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

Comment in Bug893: Now the hyphens are hard-coded into the end of word, but then the word is isolated or ending compound word

Could we hard-code them into the lexicalized compounds as well, ie. not only in the ending compound word, but also were hash is?

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3508

Date: 2010-11-16 13:56:14 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

here is a bit clearifying:

all of these compounds should be accepted by the speller

boazu-juoigi accepted hence: this is OK boazo-juoigi accpeted this is OK bohcco-juoigi NOT accepted this is NOT OK

smj: Boatsoj-sujtto NOT accepted this is NOT OK

sma: beetneh-vierhtieh NOT accepted this is NOT OK learoe-vierhtie-prosjekte accepted this is OK

more clearifying coming soon!

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3509

Date: 2010-11-16 14:09:31 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

reason why this is important is highlighted because of south-sami, where people tend to write compounds with hyphens. It is very problematic when the speller does not treat all compounds in the same way when it comes to accepting hyphened compounds or not. This is a little bit annoying in North- and Lulesami, but not at all a big problem like in south-sami.

The given examples that are marked NOT OK seems to be real bugs, but the problem is also somewhat larger than these bugs, because we have hardcoded hyphens in the end of isolated words but not in lexicalized compounds. The question then rises whether we should UN-SUB the lexicalized compounds. But how then avoid them from being suggested?

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3510

Date: 2010-11-16 14:25:42 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

TOMI: me and Sjur had a quick chat about comment3, here is the conclution:

can you make the hashes into hyphens? we want it for ALL languages, sma, sme, smj

these hyhpened compounds should be plx-coded accepted BUT NOT suggested

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3562

Date: 2010-11-25 10:58:45 +0100 From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <>

Changed priority etc. to reflect yesterday's meeting.

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3623

Date: 2010-11-29 16:10:59 +0100 From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <>

Changed priority etc. to reflect today's meeting.

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3629

Date: 2010-11-30 16:15:51 +0100 From: Sjur Nørstebø Moshagen <>

Changed priority and severity, according to today's meeting.

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3782

Date: 2011-03-03 10:44:40 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

Julevsáme, version 2.1, 2011-02-23

we get hyphened suggestions all the time now in julevsábme:

romaniæjgádijs > roman-æjgádijs gåvvåjournálissta > gåvvå-journalissta allaskåvllålektåvrrå > allaskåvllå-sektåvrrå tjerastimvædsagijt > tjerastim-vædtsagijt

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3794

Date: 2011-03-08 21:23:13 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

these are ok in latest speller:

smeDavvisámi, version 2.1, 2011-03-03 : boazu-juoigi accepted boazo-juoigi accpeted bohcco-juoigi NOT accepted

smj Julevsáme, version 2.1, 2011-03-04 : romaniæjgádijs > roman-æjgádijs gåvvåjournálissta > gåvvå-journalissta allaskåvllålektåvrrå > allaskåvllå-sektåvrrå tjerastimvædsagijt > tjerastim-vædtsagijt

thse are still not:

smj Julevsáme, version 2.1, 2011-03-04: Boatsoj-sujtto

sma Åarjelsaemien, version 1.1: beetneh-vierhtieh

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3803

Date: 2011-03-09 13:18:07 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

Åarjelsaemien, version 1.1, 2011-03-04 still suggest hyphened compounds

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3823

Date: 2011-03-16 09:17:58 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

Orjjelsámi speller does not seem to suggesthyphens any more, nor does nuortasámi, but julevsámi: sámejgiellajårggåliddjijn > sáme-giella-jårggåliddjijn, sáme-giellajårggåliddjijn

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 3824

Date: 2011-03-16 09:18:38 +0100 From: Thomas Omma <>

Julevsáme, version 2.1, 2011-03-04

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4202

Date: 2011-05-22 08:43:43 +0200 From: Trond Trosterud <>

Status after last speller release?

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4246

Date: 2011-05-23 14:31:20 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

Åarjelsaemien, version 1.1, 2011-05-19

this version comes upp with hyphened suggestions in thse cases: tjïehpieslitteratuvren adj+noun krismoere prefix+noun

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4764

Date: 2011-08-08 11:23:50 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

Davvisámi, version 2.1, 2011-05-25 prefix+noun super-muorra Julevsáme, version 2.1, 2011-05-25 prefix+noun julev-muorra Åarjelsaemien, version 1.1, 2011-05-26 see Comment14

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4972

Date: 2011-09-01 12:58:36 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

Davvisámi, version 2.1, 20110830-45217 Julevsáme, version 2.1, 20110830-45217 Åarjelsaemien, version 1.1, 20110830-45217

hyphened suggestions when prefix+noun

albbas commented 11 years ago

Comment 7689

Date: 2013-01-14 15:01:53 +0100 From: Tomi Pieski <>

We decided not to accept these because clitics get suggested with hyphens otherwise. muorra-go