giellalt / bugzilla-dummy

0 stars 0 forks source link

inf+noun compounds (Bugzilla Bug 1122) #772

Closed albbas closed 11 years ago

albbas commented 13 years ago

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 1122

Date: 2011-09-01T09:18:30+02:00 From: Thomas Omma <> To: Tomi Pieski <> CC: sjur.n.moshagen

Last updated: 2013-01-14T15:00:06+01:00

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4956

Date: 2011-09-01 09:18:30 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

boađášit-nieida moarralit-muorra muitalahttit-muorra boahtit-nieida etc

I think it is Inf.

boahtit boahtit+V+IV+Inf boahtit boahtit+V+IV+Ind+Prs+Pl1

Davvisámi, version 2.1, 20110830-45217

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4957

Date: 2011-09-01 09:19:37 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

it is not recognized here: gtsvn $ usme

boahtit-nieida boahtit-nieida boahtit-nieida +?

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 4958

Date: 2011-09-01 09:21:37 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

sorry boađášit-nieida is not recognized

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 5013

Date: 2011-09-06 13:22:10 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

found in smj as well:

Åhpaditge-konsulænnta

Speller lexicon version: Julevsáme, version 2.1, 20110905-45464

Test Date: 20110906

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 5134

Date: 2011-09-20 13:57:38 +0200 From: Tomi Pieski <>

These verbs are only accepted but not sugested? Are there any cases where inf verb should be compounded with other words? I think there was some reason to make them compound with nouns..

albbas commented 13 years ago

Comment 5137

Date: 2011-09-20 15:12:27 +0200 From: Thomas Omma <>

they seem not to be accepted any more, and that is good!

The +Inf should never be compounded

But maybe you think of other verbs that are called "infinitive", like this:

muitalan muitalit+V+TV+PrfPrc

and them we do accept in compounds

albbas commented 11 years ago

Comment 7688

Date: 2013-01-14 15:00:06 +0100 From: Tomi Pieski <>

This has been fixed.