Closed aaronfay closed 3 years ago
This is a typo in the analysis.
Instead of +12P, you should have +12Pl.
12Pl the Pl is for plural.
This is what it looks like on my computer:
$ echo 'PV/ka+atoskêw+V+AI+Ind+12Pl' | hfst-optimized-lookup --silent ./crk-normative-generator.hfstol 2>&1
PV/ka+atoskêw+V+AI+Ind+12Pl kika-atoskânaw
PV/ka+atoskêw+V+AI+Ind+12Pl kika-atoskânânaw
$ echo 'PV/ka+nikamow+V+AI+Ind+12Pl' | hfst-optimized-lookup --silent ./crk-normative-generator.hfstol 2>&1
PV/ka+nikamow+V+AI+Ind+12Pl kika-nikamonaw
PV/ka+nikamow+V+AI+Ind+12Pl kika-nikamonânaw
Ahh, I see the issue now, I've generated my list from these layouts
Ah, excellent! You've found a bug in our layouts :D thanks!
I mentioned this yesterday, there seems to be a regression in the rendering of the future definite 21P form for VAI verbs:
I would expect those to yield
and
respectively.
This is using the v2020.12.4-post.0 FSTs.