giellalt / lang-sme

Finite state and Constraint Grammar based analysers and proofing tools, and language resources for the Northern Sami language

https://giellalt.uit.no

GNU General Public License v3.0

6 stars 1 forks source link

some, not all, VUOHTA-borders have no +A tag ( #375

Closed albbas closed 14 years ago

albbas commented 14 years ago

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 852

Date: 2010-06-15T12:18:18+02:00 From: @unhammer@fsfe.org To: Trond Trosterud <> CC: thomas.omma, @unhammer@fsfe.org

Last updated: 2010-08-22T18:54:39+02:00

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3357

Date: 2010-06-15 12:18:18 +0200 From: @unhammer@fsfe.org

$ echo geafivuohta | hfst-optimized-lookup $GTHOME/trunk/gt/sme/bin/sme.hfst.ol geafivuohta geafi+CmpN/SgN+CmpN/SgG+CmpN/PlG+A+Der3+Der/vuohta+N+Sg+Nom geafivuohta geafi+CmpN/SgN+CmpN/SgG+CmpN/PlG+Der3+Der/vuohta+N+Sg+Nom geafivuohta geafivuohta+CmpN/SgG+CmpN/DefPlGen+N+Sg+Nom

The first analysis is through +A ATTR which goes to VUOHTA, the second is from a plain call to VUOHTA without adding a +A. In the second analysis, there is no explicit tag marking that geafi started as an adjective.

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3364

Date: 2010-06-15 18:06:56 +0200 From: Trond Trosterud <>

I now added a +A tag to the VUOHTA lexicon redirect in lexicon LAIKI. Have a look at the consequences for Apertium and Divvun.

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3389

Date: 2010-08-21 17:44:04 +0200 From: Trond Trosterud <>

So, for the xfst analysers we have

geafivuohta geafivuohta+N+Sg+Nom geafivuohta geafi+A+Der3+Der/vuohta+N+Sg+Nom

The lexicalised derivation does not tell it was once an adjective. This goes for all our lexicalised derivations. Now, we may of course add this, but then we would need to look at the consequences first. One alternative wouldb bel to choose the derived alternative for certain applications.

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3392

Date: 2010-08-21 21:19:59 +0200 From: @unhammer@fsfe.org

(In reply to comment #1)

I now added a +A tag to the VUOHTA lexicon redirect in lexicon LAIKI. Have a look at the consequences for Apertium and Divvun.

For Apertium, the problem is fixed. If Divvun is OK, we can mark it resolved?

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3393

Date: 2010-08-21 21:21:27 +0200 From: @unhammer@fsfe.org

(In reply to comment #2)

So, for the xfst analysers we have

geafivuohta geafivuohta+N+Sg+Nom geafivuohta geafi+A+Der3+Der/vuohta+N+Sg+Nom

The lexicalised derivation does not tell it was once an adjective. This goes for all our lexicalised derivations. Now, we may of course add this, but then we would need to look at the consequences first. One alternative wouldb bel to choose the derived alternative for certain applications.

For Apertium, we do not need to know that the lexicalised one was an adjective…

albbas commented 14 years ago

Comment 3394

Date: 2010-08-22 18:54:39 +0200 From: Trond Trosterud <>

Ok, then resolved.