Closed Robin-Hoodie closed 2 years ago
Since this is a breaking change, I'll rather merge #128 and keep this PR open.
Since this is a breaking change, I'll rather merge #128 and keep this PR open.
So are there any changes you're requesting?
Since this is a breaking change, I'll rather merge #128 and keep this PR open.
So are there any changes you're requesting?
Hello @Robin-Hoodie You can take a look to this feature request for the config : https://github.com/gilbsgilbs/babel-plugin-i18next-extract/pull/168
@xDisfigure Haven't looked at this in forever. Am I understanding things correctly that this PR is no longer necessary with the merge of #168 ?
@xDisfigure Let's close this PR if it's no longer relevant
tFunctionNames
tocustomTFunctionNames
useI18nextDefaultValue
default value tofalse
Also made me realize #128 is no longer needed should this be ready to be merged in.
If we want to hold off on merging this in for a while, #128 might be worth to be merged in for now however.