Docs increment

[gilch]

Just moving stuff over.

[gilch]

Hmm, that's weird. It's like the progn macro isn't in scope of the Sybil doctest. Didn't the other macros work?

[gilch]

Ah, I see it. I've put hidden doctests to copy in the _macro_ ns at the top of the files that need it. I wasn't able to do that here until I had the comment string macro defined, which happens just about as soon as possible, but after the bootstrap macros, one of which happens to be progn. Options:

• Move the hidden doctest higher up. Ideal, but I'd have to do it without using <<#.
• Move <<# up as far as possible, into the bootstrap section, and then move the hidden doctest immediately after that.
• Move the docstring for progn after the definition of <<# and attach it to the progn function object. Probably the easiest fix. I've already done this for the docstring of <<# itself (because how else could that work?)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #189 (d691959) into master (a97e14c) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #189   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            6         6           
  Lines          700       700           
  Branches       111       111           
=========================================
  Hits           700       700           

:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[gilch]

Well, that was easy. The hidden doctest didn't contain a " character, so I could use a normal string literal. Come to think of it, even if it had, I was discarding that comment string anyway with _#, because Sybil just reads the text statically. I didn't need the <<# to build it into a string at all. Just including the extras would have been sufficient for Sybil. I just needed some way to discard them.