Highly experimental and subject to change. Not all of the #154 ideas have been implemented yet. This one corresponds to the Arc/Anarki ssyntax as mentioned in the wiki page. I designed it to be even more powerful, based on some experience with Hissp's spiritual predecessor Drython (and a few other languages). You can almost write straight-up Lissp inside a symbol, with enough escapes (which is mostly useless, but there if you need it). Unlike Arc, it's not built into the Lissp reader, but requires a reader tag. Its expansion is also a lot more complex and kind of opaque compared to Arc's. Some fairly complex functions can be implemented as terse one-liners. Implementation is the best name.
It's definitely one of the more complex macros bundled, but still implemented in about a page of Lissp, and suprisingly a lot of that is in a single boolean expression trying to decide if the thing we just read is callable. It's defined pretty late in the file and really leverages the other bundled macros.
Highly experimental and subject to change. Not all of the #154 ideas have been implemented yet. This one corresponds to the Arc/Anarki ssyntax as mentioned in the wiki page. I designed it to be even more powerful, based on some experience with Hissp's spiritual predecessor Drython (and a few other languages). You can almost write straight-up Lissp inside a symbol, with enough escapes (which is mostly useless, but there if you need it). Unlike Arc, it's not built into the Lissp reader, but requires a reader tag. Its expansion is also a lot more complex and kind of opaque compared to Arc's. Some fairly complex functions can be implemented as terse one-liners. Implementation is the best name.
It's definitely one of the more complex macros bundled, but still implemented in about a page of Lissp, and suprisingly a lot of that is in a single boolean expression trying to decide if the thing we just read is callable. It's defined pretty late in the file and really leverages the other bundled macros.