Closed dweil closed 10 years ago
Thanks for the pull request. Can you explain what issue this causes and when? Is the concern that when the range is too small the padding logic breaks down? If that's the case, then is the "default padding" of 1 unit on either side appropriate for this, or should it be smaller? It seems if the range is extremely small (within a few orders of magnitude from epsilon as you have selected), what will happen is you'll get visually a flat line of data. I suppose that makes sense.
Yes, a flat line of data on the bottom of the chart and not in the middle. It is not visible for the user. Note that the choice of epsilon (e-300) is arbitrary. It works for my examples. Here are the screenshots I get before and after the patch with a single serie of 0.0 (or almost) : before : after :
Awesome, thanks for the patch and explaining it.
...n e-300 instead of equality