Hi， G. Kim， Thank you for your shared code about dynamic removal.
About the parameter:
downsample_voxel_size: 0.1 # user parameter but recommend to use 0.05 to make sure an enough density (this value is related to the removing resolution's expected performance)
I would like to ask, when I set it to 0.05, it works well, but when I set it to 0.1, there are a lot of FPs on the ground, resulting in hole in gound.
In my opinion, large resolution leads to the appearance or aggravation of visibility-based incidence angle ambiguity. What do you think?
Hi， G. Kim， Thank you for your shared code about dynamic removal.
About the parameter:
I would like to ask, when I set it to 0.05, it works well, but when I set it to 0.1, there are a lot of FPs on the ground, resulting in hole in gound.
In my opinion, large resolution leads to the appearance or aggravation of visibility-based incidence angle ambiguity. What do you think?
Thank you for your reply！