Make Bitwarden chart dual-licensed

[PrivatePuffin]

Not willing to contribute to this anymore, due to maintainer mixing his emotions into development. Period.

[sgissi]

Hi @Ornias1993, this is related to https://github.com/dani-garcia/bitwarden_rs/pull/1154. I don't think it makes sense to host this upstream:

• They already have pointed out in the documentation how to install using a 3rd party Helm Chart (Skeen's)
• They won't publish a repository that can be installed via Helm command-line
• The chart will still have to be maintained by me but outside my repo

I did not choose Apache license lightly, I don't want to mix GPLv3 even if under dual-license.

[sgissi]

I think you should really try being more respectful and understand that your opinion is not the only one that matters. I don't understand that "I'm not looking to host this upstream" when you opened a PR to host it in the birwarden_rs repo. If the Bitwarden_rs team is willing to maintain it going forward, I'm absolutely all for moving it over, release my copyright to the team and help as needed. But to make it community maintained makes little sense when there are two active Helm charts in place.

You are free fork and maintain it yourself as you suggested. That does make it look like you are trying to take credit for something you had very little participation on actually building or maintaining.

[sgissi]

Not willing to contribute to this anymore, due to maintainer mixing his emotions into development. Period.

It is unfortunate you feel this way, you brought interesting point of views and suggestions. I'm not angry at all, it is my ultimately my responsibility to make sure changes in the repository are consistent and I did state the decisions clearly. I strongly suggest you approach projects with more understanding and respect decisions that are different from your opinions.