Closed randomecho closed 11 years ago
From having taught Git in the classroom hundreds of times, I was very surprised that git stash apply
turned out to be more helpful in the long run (or at least closely co-taught with pop
). Folks were actually surprised in some cases by the removal of the item from the stash with pop
. Git would happily blend that with existing modified files (as long as they weren't the same files in the stash), thus making re-creating the same stash a harder experience if the user wanted to git stash save
right away again.
git init test1
cd test1
echo JUNK1 > test1.txt
git add .
git stash
echo JUNK2 > test2.txt
git stash pop
This blends stashed and non-stashed stuff together.
Thoughts?
Could totally swap around apply
for pop
.
It might still be helpful to leave in the note that if they wanted to shave off the top of the stash list
, to go with the latter and beware such ramennoodlefications.
Got lost on the example though. Only saw a difference in being able to re-apply the stash item using apply
whereas pop
is no way back. But what it threw back on to the working directory looked functionally the same.
I like the idea of keeping git stash drop
along side of apply
. pop
immediately dropping can be a little dangerous and hard for beginners to realize they cant get that stash back.
I think let's go with this (thank you @randomecho) and iterate on it. This is a super start.
Quick overview on what
git stash
is and some of the basic commands to run with it.Going with
git stash pop
as the default means of extracting from the stack instead ofgit stash apply
. Former feels like the path of least surprise by taking out what you've just put in.Could fit under the Basic section. Thoughts?
As requested in #36