search

git / git.github.io

Git Developer Pages (This is NOT the place to discuss Git issues. See: https://git-scm.com/community)
https://git.github.io
314 stars 281 forks source link

Any comment about upcoming Git Rev News edition 53 #384

Closed chriscool closed 5 years ago

chriscool commented 5 years ago

A currently mostly empty draft is there:

https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-53.md

Feel free to comment in this issue, suggest topics, suggest persons to interview, or use the edit button (that looks like a pen) to edit and create a pull request with the changes you would like.

Let's try to publish this edition on Wednesday July 24th 2019!

Thanks!

cc @jnareb @mjaix @gaalcaras @gitster

jnareb commented 5 years ago

Topics that might be interesting to add to this edition (not all of them, probably):

jnareb commented 5 years ago

Also, new links:

chriscool commented 5 years ago

@jnareb I think the links to the GSoC blogs have been given in https://git.github.io/rev_news/2019/05/22/edition-51/ already.

chriscool commented 5 years ago

I am not so sure the results of the intermediary GSoC evaluations are very interesting. Anyway both students passed these evaluations.

chriscool commented 5 years ago

Thanks for the other ideas though!

jnavila commented 5 years ago

As a side note: the translations of the manpages are available on git-scm.com. For instance: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-add/pt_BR

mjaix commented 5 years ago

Just contributed my usual tiny typo and structure fixes.

Best regards, Markus

jnareb commented 5 years ago

Added a few links in "Light reading" section in ce9c307

jnareb commented 5 years ago

Topics that might be interesting to add to this edition (not all of them, probably):

  • [ ] ~results of intermediary GSoC evaluation~

True, the results of the intermediary GSoC evaluations might not be interesting enough

The discussion continues, so it perhaps be better postponed for the next edition.

Thanks @chriscool for the writeup.

chriscool commented 5 years ago

@mjaix and @jnareb thanks for your improvements and additions!

@jnavila thanks for the information, but I don't know much about the translations of the manpages. Could you explain a little bit more, for example what happened, who contributed what, and how it's possible to see what's available? If you don't have time now, this could go in the next edition. By the way are you ok to be interviewed in the next edition?

chriscool commented 5 years ago

@jnareb about the topics you suggest that haven't been covered in this edition, I think that as usual I will copy them to the issue for the next edition. Thanks anyway for them! I find it very useful and time saving to get good suggestions like this!

jnavila commented 5 years ago

@chriscool for the moment, the project of translation of the manpages leaves outside the Git project. There were some patches in the main repo to allow to reuse the Makefiles rules for translated content. The timing for writing a blurb on this for tomorrow is too short indeed. Please ping me when you need some content for the next Git Rev News issue. By that time, I hope to have more to say.

chriscool commented 5 years ago

Published: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD0et8CNHXmmdyJp2mTA5OegduT2Am234SzG06o_X+4QGg@mail.gmail.com/