Open myyk opened 1 year ago
Firstly, thanks for this awesome template! I'm pretty new to Next, so I'm sorry if this isn't a very good issue.
I believe that the mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/universal:2 image used in this template is only built for x86-64 arch according to https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/tree/main/containers/codespaces-linux. I'm guessing this is going to run into many performance issues for amd64 users like me on Apple silicon.
mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/universal:2
x86-64
amd64
I found a simple change like this seems to at least work enough for a template: https://github.com/github/codespaces-nextjs/compare/main...myyk:codespaces-nextjs:patch-1 (pls excused the misleading comment on it and the bad formatting)
I don't know if there are other reasons why devcontainers/universal was used instead of devcontainers/typescript-node though.
devcontainers/universal
devcontainers/typescript-node
You Looks Right myyk
RanaRabees
commented
1 year ago RanaRabees
commented
1 year ago
Firstly, thanks for this awesome template! I'm pretty new to Next, so I'm sorry if this isn't a very good issue.
I believe that the
mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/universal:2image used in this template is only built forx86-64arch according to https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/tree/main/containers/codespaces-linux. I'm guessing this is going to run into many performance issues foramd64users like me on Apple silicon.I found a simple change like this seems to at least work enough for a template: https://github.com/github/codespaces-nextjs/compare/main...myyk:codespaces-nextjs:patch-1 (pls excused the misleading comment on it and the bad formatting)
I don't know if there are other reasons why
devcontainers/universalwas used instead ofdevcontainers/typescript-nodethough.