Open cireu opened 3 years ago
Alphine -> Alpine
You are right, if you're interested in Guix as a "package manager", starting from Alpine will get you up and running much quicker than the procedure described in Guix-on-WSL2.md
.
If you're interested in the Guix System (that is the Guix package manager plus the distribution built around it), Guix-on-WSL2.md
is still relevant in my opinion.
Guix-on-WSL2.md is still relevant in my opinion.
The post binary install section(How to make a WSL compatible operating-system
record and boot it) of this article is very useful. But I think user can use Alpine when they're not ready for the Guix binary installation, because it's simpler than the manual way(boot Busybox rootfs, mount device, write etc files) described in Guix-on-WSL2.md
.
Maybe you can add I tips to tell readers that using Alpine to do binary installation is another possible approach(Then they can use guix system reconfigure
to override the original Alpine distro)
Thanks for your Guix-on-WSL2.md!
I found a much easier way to start a environment ready for bootstrap Guix. Use the Alpine Image provided in Microsoft Store. It's very small (about 2 MiB) and provide anything needed for bootstrap. I think this is much simpler than using Busybox rootfs and do the rest job manually.