In HTML terms the anchor in the document would be where the id or name is {hash} not #{hash} right? I'm sure some peeps do include the hash in the id, but I'm 99% certain the intention is that it wouldn't be there. Maybe this XPath should be something like (or something a little more optimised, my XPath isn't that strong):
I've come across what, I think, is a bug in the hash checker.
You have this XPath:
In HTML terms the anchor in the document would be where the
id
orname
is{hash}
not#{hash}
right? I'm sure some peeps do include the hash in theid
, but I'm 99% certain the intention is that it wouldn't be there. Maybe this XPath should be something like (or something a little more optimised, my XPath isn't that strong):