Closed gkaguirre closed 7 years ago
Explored this and found it doesn't do so well. Sticking with the existing approach based upon proportion max cone density.
I note that the proportion max cone density regularization brings the Watson 2014 prediction for the cardinal meridians into excellent alignment, with the exception of the superior temporal meridian.
Current done in terms of max cone density. Perhaps proportion of the cumulative density (as is done for the mRGC:RGC function) would work better across meridians.