search

gkdr / lurch

XEP-0384: OMEMO Encryption for libpurple.
GNU General Public License v3.0
289 stars 32 forks source link

Debian package #141

Closed shtrom closed 3 years ago

shtrom commented 4 years ago

RFP/ITP at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=905883

Builds with

dpkg-buildpackage --no-sign

until I work out how to make it use my key.

gkdr commented 3 years ago

i have read that the packaging files should NOT reside in the same repo. do you know anything about this matter?

shtrom commented 3 years ago

I've seen both, but I think that outside of the repo is preferred. Though some packaging is better thai none (:

I think either lurch of carbon have been packaged separately in Debian since this PR was created. It might be worth checking how they did it. -- Olivier Mehani shtrom@ssji.net Sent from my mobile, please excuse my brevity.

jre-wine commented 3 years ago

I think either lurch of carbon have been packaged separately in Debian since this PR was created. It might be worth checking how they did it.

Indeed luckily both have been packaged in Debian and are available there since a few weeks now: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/purple-lurch https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/purple-xmpp-carbons

Thanks everyone!

jre-wine commented 3 years ago

i have read that the packaging files should NOT reside in the same repo. do you know anything about this matter?

Yes, generally it is preferred to have no debian/ directory in upstream's (your) releases. But with modern packaging practices it doesn't really matter anymore, because it just gets discarded and replaced by Debian's debian/ dir.

gkdr commented 3 years ago

first off, thanks for the contribution, @shtrom. sorry it took me so long to reply at all.

@jre-wine thanks for clarifying. so since it's already packaged, it probably does not make sense to merge this?

shtrom commented 3 years ago

On 6 December 2020 7:49:10 am AEDT, Richard Bayerle notifications@github.com wrote:

first off, thanks for the contribution, @shtrom. sorry it took me so long to reply at all.

@jre-wine thanks for clarifying. so since it's already packaged, it probably does not make sense to merge this?

Yup. No worries. -- Olivier Mehani shtrom@ssji.net Sent from my mobile, please excuse my brevity.

jre-wine commented 3 years ago

@gkdr thanks. From the perspective from Debian and Tails I think there is indeed no need for a debian/ packaging here. Just continue to work with them if they bring up something specific.

gkdr commented 3 years ago

i'm closing this then. thanks for the clarification @jre-wine, and thanks for your contribution (and patience) @shtrom :slightly_smiling_face: