Closed yvanblanchard closed 6 months ago
Is it a bug or a limitation of the actual loader library ?
No this is how the "0" orientation are defined for the joints in this URDF model.
I think components should be correctly placed and connections (joints) between them as well.
There is no requirement in the URDF specification that the 0-angle joints be oriented in a physically possible way. When using a robotic model like this the joint values reported by the solver in the ROS system would orient the kinematics correctly.
Unfortunately URDF does not support parallel-kinematic systems so there's no way to infer from the file how these joints should be connected without some manual annotation.
OK, clear , thank you Garett
@gkjohnson please notice that there is a trick to handle closed chains kinematics in urdf: through gazebo xml tag: https://github.com/2b-t/closed_loop/blob/humble/urdf/closed_loop.urdf.xacro
Hello,
I tried to load the hexapod URDF file with the loader lib, but result does not look fine:
I know that this loader does not contain IK solver (just URDF viewer), but I think components should be correctly placed and connections (joints) between them as well. The urdf data were taken from your 'PI_ROS_Driver/master/pi_hexapod_driver' repo.
Is it a bug or a limitation of the actual loader library ? Thank for your help.