Closed ozra closed 6 years ago
You'd need @rhendric 's approval though.
Doesn't co
work with yield
though? Did Koa switch to full async
/await
?
Otherwise, which fork is best maintained (following gkz/) with the feature
I only know of @summivox 's fork
any consensus in the LS-community?
I don't think that's active enough to reach such a consensus.
Thanks for the intell @vendethiel! I've just started gathering intell on what techs to use for the nodejs part.
LS is a given, even though I will most likely compile it down to JS further down the line for other developers to maintain.
From what I've quickly gleaned Koa2 seems to go the async
/ await
road.
I'm gonna evaluate available options a bit more before nailing down the roadmap.
Thanks again!
I can only hope #836 will end up in a release soon.
Is lack of tests and documentation what hinders it from happening?
For now I'm trying out the livescript-async
npm uploaded by @gkovacs.
Tests at least. (I don't have a plan for dealing with LS documentation issues in general; the website hasn't been updated since the 1.4 release and I haven't looked into what it would take to bring it up to date.)
I haven't reviewed the code in that PR yet; I'm waiting for its author to add tests and tell me that it's ready for a review, since it's been a work in progress for so long. If review turns up any issues, obviously someone will have to deal with those.
I'm on vacation and honestly I haven't been able to spare time on this project for quite a while.
Ryan can you take over?
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017, 13:21 Ryan Hendrickson notifications@github.com wrote:
Tests at least. (I don't have a plan for dealing with LS documentation issues in general; the website hasn't been updated since the 1.4 release and I haven't looked into what it would take to bring it up to date.)
I haven't reviewed the code in that PR yet; I'm waiting for its author to add tests and tell me that it's ready for a review, since it's been a work in progress for so long. If review turns up any issues, obviously someone will have to deal with those.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/gkz/LiveScript/issues/977#issuecomment-330661824, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsEGU5CTHVcgPPzfPSbeycndoogL8mhks5skCJUgaJpZM4PcaiP .
--
Yin Zhong
I don't have a lot of disposable time, myself. Someone who feels strongly about having this feature in official LiveScript should pick it up in this case.
@rhendric I'm happy to pick this up as I've been using this feature in production for several months now, I've made a new pull request containing tests at https://github.com/gkz/LiveScript/pull/978 please review when you have time, thank you.
I know there is a number of issues on this and related, I just post this to get a fresh up to date perspective.
I'm back to some contract nodejs-coding for the first time in a few years of mainly systems coding. Now it seems Koa and similar frameworks are established enough to be usable. So of course I want to do that. And of course I want to code in LiveScript.
So, what gives?
async
andawait
keywords come in main distro LiveScript soon?