Closed rjhd2 closed 1 year ago
Code updated, but currently fix=True
so missing calm values should be being replaced. Need to check in output files to ensure they are handling that correctly
Need to check whether this output is implementing the fix or not correctly before raising a PR
Noting that the fix
option for the wind direction is applied to the data variable within the station object, but this is not transferred across to the data frame. The plan was to not make any data changes as part of this QC, so this was never implemented.
Update at USAF to fix missing calm period wind speeds (see Dunn et al, 2022) has resulted in "C-Calm" being added to the mesurement flags for wind speed and wind direction in the latest pull from USAF. They have also included "999" in the wind direction observation_value field - as per a standard missing data indicator. However, we don't use this approach in these .psv data, so these need to be removed.
Notes below from Nancy Casey (NCEI): Here's just a sample of old notes I took -- so it's incomplete but still illustrates the issue.
Here's a different example of 2 lines in ISD format: