Closed paddyroddy closed 1 month ago
I don't find .cff files at all useful, since no one in our field would know what to do with them. Let's do a .bib file with bibtex from ADS: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023OJAp....6E..11T/exportcitation
The .cff format will enable copy-pastable citation in a dropdown menu on github, offering both APA and BibTex formats -
This has become a standard for software citations, but I'll also be happy to convert the .md file to a .bib file.
That's pretty cool, but I would rather not lose the extra metadata from the ADS entry,
Oh I see, .bib sounds good then!
The .cff format will enable copy-pastable citation in a dropdown menu on github, offering both APA and BibTex formats -
This has become a standard for software citations, but I'll also be happy to convert the .md file to a .bib file.
Wouldn't a CITATION.cff
, which only refers to the paper, be useful to benefit from this GitHub feature? An easy way to get a citation that you might not get otherwise. Can always also include a paper citation in the README like this.
Having a BibTex entry in the README and a .cff
file to enable GitHub's feature sounds better imo. PyBaMM (BibTex in README, .cff file for GitHub) does the same too. I'll reopen this issue for more discussion.
Discussed in meeting and will adapt to CITATION.cff
It's a dedicated file format designed to promote code as research https://citation-file-format.github.io, but can also promote papers using the
preferred
syntax