Closed J3RN closed 6 months ago
So how do I get this tree-sitter requirement to work with Emacs 28.1?
I followed the README which talks about tree-sitter as a requirement… So Emacs complains about: (file-missing Cannot open load file No such file or directory tree-sitter) and my question is how I install this tree-sitter requirement?
@etnt I'm having the same problem with Emacs 30, but I think this should be in a separate issue.
@etnt It seems you need to manually install the Emacs Treesitter Packages as described here.
I think adding this to the documentation might be a good idea.
Emacs 29 ships treesit.el
, while the current gleam-mode depends on tree-sitter.el
. They are slightly different in API, and recent packages supporting the former are named like typescript-ts-mode
, elixir-ts-mode
, etc. Hence if you wanted to add support for treesit.el
to this package, the library would be named gleam-ts-mode
.
With an extra effort, it would be possible for this mode to provide the two versions simultaneously, but it is such a burden to the maintainers. I would propose forking this repository to create a new gleam-ts-mode
and, as soon as Emacs 29 is officially released, make this gleam-mode
enter maintenance mode. In the meantime, the users should migrate to Emacs 29 and use gleam-ts-mode
.
I couldn't have said it better myself :grin: Though if the immensity of elixir-ts-mode is anything to go by, it'll be a while before a gleam-ts-mode
is finished.
@etnt It seems you need to manually install the Emacs Treesitter Packages as described here.
I think adding this to the documentation might be a good idea.
Thanks, I got it to work with an additional Melpa install of 'tree-sitter-indent as well.
I couldn't have said it better myself grin Though if the immensity of elixir-ts-mode is anything to go by, it'll be a while before a
gleam-ts-mode
is finished.
Well, for the Elixir mode, some 200 lines are just faces and constant definitions and some 150 are almost copy pasted from the upstream hightlights.scm
queries.
The rest seems quite complex, though...
I guess the only way to check how hard it is would be to try to implement it :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
@akirak upstream, some modes were split between a base package, the original regex-based syntax/indentation and the new tree sitter package. For example, you have
python-base-mode
python-mode
(that uses regex for syntax and indentation)python-ts-mode
python-base-mode
contains common functionalities. Both python-mode
and python-ts-mode
inherit from it. Maybe this package could have a similar structure and provide both versions. I don't know.
python-base-mode contains common functionalities. Both python-mode and python-ts-mode inherit from it. Maybe this package could have a similar structure and provide both versions.
Separating out common functionalities would be nice. The situation is not exactly the same, though. The three Python-related modes are all part of python.el
which is part of GNU Emacs. The current gleam-mode
depends on tree-sitter.el
which users of Emacs 29 wouldn't want to install. gleam-mode
and gleam-ts-mode
should reside in separate files and submitted separately to MELPA. You can put those files in the same repository, as MELPA recipes support :files
spec.
It's just about packaging, so there is not much to worry about. gleam-mode
is not on MELPA yet, so there wouldn't be much trouble however you change the structure of this repository.
Right. I wasn't sure if (and don't think) MELPA would allow git submodules, so I was waiting for a better solution before pushing to MELPA. gleam-ts-mode
will likely be that solution :grin:
@akirak Oh right! I forgot about the dependencies, specially as tree-sitter-indent
isn't packaged yet... two separate packages (even in the same repo) looks like the best idea.
@J3RN It seems the sub-module is required for the highlight queries and the tree sitter grammar. For the first one, the queries are usually placed inside the source file, and for the second one, you could copy what elixir-ts-mode
does and use treesit-install-language-grammar
to install the grammar directly from the repo url. Then I guess the sub-module could be removed.
But I think you could do both things with the current implementation as well. Just move the hightlighs.scm
file to the repo source code and maybe copy the treesit-install-language-grammar
implementation.
Is the package supposed to work on emacs 29? I'm trying and get the tree-sitter-indent
issue:
⛔ Error (use-package): gleam-mode/:catch: Cannot open load file: No such file or directory, tree-sitter-indent
I thought maybe it was supposed to use the submodule and work on 29+?
Just checking in to see if anyone has any better idea of when this package will work on emacs 29? Looking forward to learning this language, would really love it if it worked on my daily editor
Hello, friends. I've started work on a treesit
version of this package, which you can find in the gleam-ts-mode
branch here on GitHub. It's not finished, but syntax highlighting is (at least mostly) working. Please try it out and let me know how it goes. PRs are also welcome! :pray:
sorry if this is a really basic question, but can you walk me through giving this a spin? I put in (use-package gleam-mode :load-path "<path-to-cloned-repository-with-gleam-ts-mode-checked-out>")
, but it doesn't seem to change anything...
A few things:
min.el
and then starting Emacs with that by running emacs -q --load min.el
. It just helps cut down the possibilities of what could be wrong, and a small init file can be pasted into a GitHub comment.use-package
declaration, namely that you want gleam-ts-mode
instead of gleam-mode
.gleam-mode
in all ways you can before trying gleam-ts-mode
. I believe they both lay claim to .gleam
files and heaven only knows how Emacs handles that.M-x gleam-ts-install-grammar
. I forgot to put that in the README originally; I'm going to do that now.I'm generally out of my depth here (new to Gleam, not fluent in elisp whatsoever), but I'm pretty sure gleam-ts-mode.el
is currently missing the necessary ;;;###autoload
comments. Adding those, I can enable the mode and syntax highlighting seems to work (using Doom, Emacs 29.1).
@J3RN Thank you so much! The new branch works perfectly.
For lurkers, in order to get LSP working I had to modify this file on my local machine and add gleam-ts-mode
to :major-modes
. On Doom, this file can be found at ~/.config/emacs/.local/straight/repos/lsp-mode/clients/lsp-gleam.el
. Then I added this snippet to my personal config.el
:
(load! "gleam-ts-mode.el") ; just copy-pasted
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.gleam$" . gleam-ts-mode))
(add-to-list 'lsp-language-id-configuration '(gleam-ts-mode . "gleam"))
(add-hook 'gleam-ts-mode-hook #'lsp!)
Once you're comfortable merging this branch, I'll submit this patch to lsp-mode:) Thanks again!
@it-is-wednesday doom uses straight.el
under the hood which obviates the need to copy/paste and load gleam-ts-mode.el
manually. Add this to packages.el
:
(package! gleam-ts-mode
:recipe (:type git
:host github
:repo "gleam-lang/gleam-mode"
:branch "gleam-ts-mode"
:files ("gleam-ts-mode.el")))
After next doom sync
this will automatically clone the repo and add it to load path.
My other config is pretty simple too:
(use-package! gleam-ts-mode
:commands gleam-ts-mode
:bind (:map gleam-ts-mode-map
("C-c g f" . gleam-format))
:init
(add-to-list 'auto-mode-alist '("\\.gleam$" . gleam-ts-mode))
:config
(add-hook 'gleam-ts-mode-hook #'eglot-ensure 'append))
With 1.0.0 release, perhaps it will be better to publish gleam-ts-mode
to MELPA? It should also encourage new contributions as things as not as easy to find ATM.
I have just updated the gleam-ts-mode
with Imenu and commenting support. The only blocker currently is indentation, which I'll work on next.
I just merged the gleam-ts-mode
branch. Please follow the instructions in the README for trying it out, and please open issues with any difficulties you encounter!
Aside: This is most likely going to just be a note to myself.
Emacs 29 introduces first-party support for tree-sitter, so we'd no longer have to rely on a third-party package to provide syntax highlighting. We should transition to this new system when possible.