For the tags queries, it seemed odd that we were using definition.type and reference.type for tracking constructors. However, none of the standard set of capture names seem applicable (maybe class?), so I made up constructor and hope that most systems don't hardcode the standard set.
For the tags queries, it seemed odd that we were using
definition.typeandreference.typefor tracking constructors. However, none of the standard set of capture names seem applicable (maybeclass?), so I made upconstructorand hope that most systems don't hardcode the standard set.