search

glebd / cocoafob

A set of registration code generation and verification helpers for Obj-C, Ruby (Potion Store), PHP and FastSpring
Other
469 stars 57 forks source link

Tons of warnings #7

Open ghost opened 11 years ago

ghost commented 11 years ago

I'm building for 10.7 SDK on 10.8 if that helps.

Screen Shot 2013-03-06 at 2 15 26 PM

glebd commented 11 years ago

Use no_openssl branch.

Best regards, Gleb

On 6 Mar 2013, at 20:17, sdegutis notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm building for 10.7 SDK on 10.8 if that helps.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

ghost commented 11 years ago

This means I'll have to ditch the commit ba49865c8372c102d1880ab2d48bb50f084fce39 that's only on master.. but that's probably fine.. right?

glebd commented 11 years ago

That commit is OpenSSL-specific, so you don't want it.

On 7 Mar 2013, at 03:20, sdegutis notifications@github.com wrote:

This means I'll have to ditch the commit ba49865 that's only on master.. but that's probably fine.. right?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

ghost commented 11 years ago

Sold.

ghost commented 11 years ago

Actually, this only solves a few of these deprecation warnings. SHA1 and BIO_[etc] all still raise warnings.

ghost commented 11 years ago

(Plus the no_openssl branch gives me false-successes on verification.)

js commented 11 years ago

Any update on this? What's the status of the no_openssl branch? at a glance it look fine…

Running the tests (+ adding tests for invalid licence codes) doesn't give any false-positives. @sdegutis

glebd commented 11 years ago

I'm using the no_ssl branch myself for a Lion-only app. Seems OK.

On 12 Apr 2013, at 12:01, Johan Sørensen notifications@github.com wrote:

Any update on this? What's the status of the no_openssl branch? at a glance it look fine…

Running the tests (+ adding tests for invalid licence codes) doesn't give any false-positives. @sdegutis

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.