Closed codegoalie closed 7 years ago
If I read the README.rdoc correctly that would be GNU GPL, the included nothugly.xsl uses MIT.
Good catch. I updated this commit.
Doesn't this commit make the gem dual licensed under both MIT and GPL-2?
As I understand it, the spec licenses
is for the licenses that apply to the gem/library, and not to those of sub-components.
The license information for GPL-2.0 was added to the gemspec 7 months ago: https://github.com/glejeune/Ruby-Graphviz/commit/5f5131fb7e6200030f6c042f42744d314baba5ad
This issue can now be closed.
I was trying to determine the licenses for my dependencies. I found that the RubyGems API will return the license, but only if it is specified in your gemspec file.