Closed polluxsynth closed 10 years ago
It's not meant as a debug tool, it's just the most precise scale that can still be displayed. Maybe 0-99 would be enough precision tho, even if I personally prefer 0-255.
I seem to recall reading in the p600fw manual that the internal resolution is even higher than 0..255 ?
I personally think 0..99 (or 0.0 .. 9.9, 10) would be more user friendly and gives sufficient resolution.
Yes, the lowest pot scanning is resolution is 8bits but it can go up to 12bits for critical ones. It does seem more user friendly, so maybe I should do it that way, I'll have to think about it.
0.99 or -50..49 depending on the pot now, it does seem better that way :)
Wouldn't it be more practical if the value shown in the display when the knobs are turned was, for instance 0.0 to 10, instead of 0-255? I agree that 0-255 is probably very useful for debugging, but for an ordinary user, 0.0 to 10 would better match what is on the panel.