Added `mreport()` function

[henriquesposito]

Description

These patch changes to {messydates} include the addition of the mreport() function to properly report on data with 'mdate' variables.

Package

• Updated README by removing unattractive package startup messages
• Updated battles data included in package

Functions

• Closed #54 by adding new mreport() function to properly report on data containing 'mdate' variables
• Updated expand() function
  • Fixed bug with the expansion of approximate dates
  • Removed unnecessary function message

Checklist:

• [x] PR form
  • [x] I have given this pull request an informative title
  • [x] Description above itemizes changes under subtitles, e.g. "## Collection""
  • [x] Any closed, fixed, or related issues are referenced and explained in the description above, e.g. "Fixed #0 by adding A"
  • [x] Package builds on my OS without issues
• [ ] PR checks all pass for latest commit
  • [x] Package builds on Mac
  • [x] Package builds on Windows
  • [x] Package builds on Linux
  • [ ] CodeCov check: Package improves or maintains good test coverage
  • [x] CodeFactor check: Package improves or maintains good style
• [x] Documentation
  • [x] Any new or modified functions or data have roxygen style documentation in their .R scripts
  • [x] Any longer functions are commented inline so that it is easier to debug in the future
  • [x] PR description above and the NEWS.md file are aligned
  • [x] DESCRIPTION file version is bumped by the appropriate increment (major, minor, patch)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #61 (d0264c7) into main (2329515) will decrease coverage by 2.75%. The diff coverage is 58.46%.

:exclamation: Current head d0264c7 differs from pull request most recent head 9dab641. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9dab641 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #61      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.50%   88.75%   -2.76%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines         765      818      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits          700      726      +26     
- Misses         65       92      +27     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/report.R	41.30% <41.30%> (ø)
R/contract.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
R/expand.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
R/logical.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[henriquesposito]

Should we keep the article in a separate branch for now? If we are to include it here we should also, perhaps, mentions it in the read.me and/or in the website, as well as change the JSS format to another one. What do you think @jhollway and @jaeltan ?