Closed mrmonat closed 3 years ago
Hi Luca, a good question because the xsd:choice seems indeed to be unnecessary at the moment.
The current logic is:
PhotometryFileReference
Rotation-G0
AND/OR DescriptivePhotometry
The choice element beforehand PhotometryFileReference
is a preparation for a possible extension in the future: The possibility to provide photometric intensity distributions directly inside the gldf xml INSTEAD of an external file reference on Eulumdat or IES.
So a possible logic in the future could be:
PhotometryFileReference
OR a mandatory IntensityDistribution
collectionRotation-G0
AND/OR DescriptivePhotometry
Thanks for the clarification :)
The choice element doesn't seem correct (or at the correct position) in the xsd definition for a photometry.
Should it be possible to specify a
PhotometryFileReference
OR (Rotation-G0
ANDDescriptivePhotometry
) or should it be possible to specify aPhotometryFileReference
ANDRotation-G0
ANDDescriptivePhotometry
?