Closed simongray closed 3 years ago
Thanks for pointing things out, the examples are indeed wrong.
I will replace with rasher / bacon (English) ekor / kucing (Indonesian) 匹 / 猫 (Japanese)
Why knife classifies sword ? Isn't it not a kind of
?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 2:03 AM Alexandre Rademaker < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Why knife classifies sword ? Isn't it not a kind of?
No, all the examples are wrong.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/globalwordnet/gwadoc/issues/72#issuecomment-764820808, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPZRTE5RNEP365NSXA4SLS3BRR5ANCNFSM4WMZINVQ .
-- Francis Bond http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/ Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies Nanyang Technological University
No, all the examples are wrong.
And the definition looks broken:
Definition
A relation between a classifier concept A and concept B. A relation between a classifier A and B
Also...
I will replace with rasher / bacon (English) ekor / kucing (Indonesian) 匹 / 猫 (Japanese)
So are these just numeral classifiers or does it include other things, like measure words? I don't suppose we have those in other wordnets (they aren't a supported part of speech, e.g., for 匹 in the Japanese Wordnet). In English they are also nouns, so that might work out. But I don't have "rasher" in my dialect, and it's not even in the English WordNet, so maybe head / cattle?
Taken from: https://globalwordnet.github.io/gwadoc/#classifies
This example caused me to pause and wonder how on earth a hammer might classify a teapot. Is it because hammers can break teapots..? Is it because some metal teapots are made in part using a hammer...?
Here are two things that could be the case:
classifies
means is lacking.