Open arademaker opened 4 years ago
I certainly have no objection to this, as long as we ensure that the documentation is also written for this format.
Good, we must decide the structure of the documentation to specific what all formats must provide.
I think this closed by the release of v1.1. @arademaker can you confirm (by closing this issue) or expand on what we still need?
Can we have more than one RDF schema? The schema adopted by http://openwordnet-pt.org precedes the W3C OntoLex Model being based on https://www.w3.org/TR/wordnet-rdf/. We have the schema specification and we are also developing a https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/ validation.