search

globalwordnet / schemas

WordNet-LMF formats
https://globalwordnet.github.io/schemas/
20 stars 11 forks source link

Lexicographer File Attribute #26

Closed jmccrae closed 3 years ago

jmccrae commented 4 years ago

Should we have an attribute for lexicographer files? Is this something that many (more than one) wordnet projects use?

arademaker commented 4 years ago

I think it is important.

rwingerter55 commented 4 years ago

It could be useful. Open English WordNet uses dcterms:subject (with values like "noun.act" etc.), and with an attribute for lexicographer files no information would be lost if the value of dcterms:subject is changed.

jmccrae commented 4 years ago

I guess the simple solution here is to have a lexfile attribute on the synset?


        <Synset id="example-en-10161911-n" ili="i90287" partOfSpeech="n" lexfile="noun.example">
        ...
        </Synset>
``
goodmami commented 4 years ago

If we go with an attribute, then what you have looks good.

If we go with a separate file for #25, it seems like this could get the same treatment as they are similar (they're for backwards compatibility, the mapping is not likely to change, they're mainly relevant for PWN-derived resources, ...).

fcbond commented 4 years ago

I think in this case people may add them still to new synsets (it has been on my todo list for a long time), so there is value in having them in the wordnet.

1313ou commented 4 years ago

This is fine if merging is lossless.