NOT IMPLEMENTED: extract DOI from URL field - Githubissues

globbestael / DedupEndNote

Deduplication of EndNote RIS files

http://dedupendnote.nl

Apache License 2.0

1 stars 1 forks source link

NOT IMPLEMENTED: extract DOI from URL field #14

Closed globbestael closed 9 months ago

globbestael commented 9 months ago

Candidate enhancement

The URL field can have embedded DOI's, e.g. http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0097656&representation=PDFhttp://www.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=emed15&AN=373161115https://ed-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/44UOE/44UOE_VU2?sid=OVID:Embase&id=pmid:24852037&id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0097656&issn=1932-6203&isbn=&volume=9&issue=5&spage=&pages=&date=2014&title=PLoS+ONE&atitle=Comparison+of+high+vs.+normal%2Flow+protein+diets+on+renal+function+in+subjects+without+chronic+kidney+disease%3A+A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&aulast=Schwingshackl&pid=& which could be added to the DOI's form the DOI field

Test results

Test show mixed results:

ASySD_Neuroimaging: TP -2, FN +2
ASySD_SRSR_Human: TP -1, FN -1, FP +2

Problems

Errata (a.o. from EMBASE Ovid) can have the DOI of the corrected publications in their title. The URL contains the DOI from the title field as well as the DOI from the DOI field. The first one leads to false positives: the erratum record s seen as a duplicate of the original publication, and (as it is later) takes precedence on the original publication

VERDICT

Not implemented