Open tslawecki opened 7 years ago
Adding @benfish - guessing that's Ben Adams - in case he has any insight into the private IPs ...
Adding @benjwadams
@tslawecki, Docker's stock configuration creates a bridge network over which containers can communicate with each other. See https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/networking . If you're looking for overall disk/CPU usage you can safely ignore the 172.* IP addresses and use the host IP.
@benjwadams - My munin host is only available through the 192. private network. Do you see any issues arising from adding the requisite 192. addresses to the portal.glos.us ipconfig? As I understand it, munin-node has to be configured to allow access from the munin server which has a 192.* address.
Appears to be an issue with Munin master being able to reach portal.glos.us due to the two servers residing on different subnets.
@benjwadams @tslawecki what's the conclusion here?
I'm looking to set up munin for tracking disk and CU usage on this VM, and noted that it's currently listing 172.18.0.1 and 172.17.0.1 as private IPs in ifconfig. I'm not sure who set this up - I'm guessing Luke - can these be safely changed to 192.168.76.tbd to put them in the same subdomain as the Munin server, or is there something in Docker or the portals dependent on these IPs?